ONE PEOPLE'S PROJECT

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

WILL CLARENCE THOMAS RESIGN?

E-mail Print PDF

Clarence ThomasOf all the Supreme Court Justices, none has been more unpopular than Clarence Thomas. Appointed by George H.W. Bush to feel the seat held by Thurgood Marshall, he has been a lightning rod for conservative and racial politics. In the past year or so however, it has gotten worse because of how involved he has been in not just partisan politics but activist politics. When his wife Ginny Thomas started becoming indentified as a head teabagger and started making a spectacle of herself, that's when the problems began. Then people started to ask just how involved were the Thomases. On Sunday the New York Times published an article that might be the answer to that question. A very bad answer for Clarence. Seems that he has been taking gifts from conservative donors, which after Ginny taking money for things he has had to deal with in court, isn't going over well. As of right now, the calls for him to resign are getting louder and louder and it just might happen. Everything is preliminary, but once an elected official makes that demand, consider Thomas toast. We just might have the talk of the summer, and frankly it is something that needs to continue. Conservatives have always complained about activist judges. Maybe now they will stop pushing them on the side.

ThinkProgress

Justice Clarence Thomas is an ethics problem in a black robe. Just eight months after ThinkProgress broke the story of Thomas’ attendance at a Koch-sponsored political fundraiser, we learn that Thomas doesn’t just do unethical favors for wealthy right-wing donors — they also do expensive favors for him.

Leading conservative donor Harlan Crow, whose company often litigates in federal court, donated $500,000 to allow Thomas’s wife to start a Tea Party group and he once gave Thomas a $19,000 Bible that belonged to Frederick Douglass. The American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank which frequently files briefs in Thomas’ Court, also gave Thomas a $15,000 gift.

If this sounds familiar, it’s because America has seen this movie before. Indeed, the Thomas scandal is little more than a remake of the forty year-old gifting scandal that brought down Justice Abe Fortas. Like Thomas, Fortas liked to associate with wealthy individuals with potential business before his Court. And like Thomas, Fortas took inappropriate gifts from his wealthy benefactors.

Fortas’ questionable gifts first came out when President Johnson nominated him for a promotion to Chief Justice of the United States in 1968. Fortas had accepted $15,000 to lead seminars at American University — far more than the university normally paid for such services — and the payments were bankrolled by the leaders of frequent corporate litigants including the vice president of Phillip Morris. Fortas survived this revelation, although his nomination for the Chief Justiceship was filibustered into oblivion.

Just a year later, the country learned that Fortas took another highly questionable gift. In 1966, one year after Fortas joined the Court, stock speculator Louis E. Wolfson’s foundation began paying Fortas an annual retainer of $20,000 per year for consulting services. Fortas’ actions were legal, and he eventually returned the money after Wolfson was convicted of securities violations and recused himself from Wolfson’s case, but the damage to Fortas — and the potential harm to the Supreme Court’s reputation — were too great. Fortas resigned in disgrace.

It is difficult to distinguish Fortas’ scandal from Thomas’. Like Fortas, Thomas accepted several very valuable gifts from parties who are frequently interested in the outcome of federal court cases. One of Thomas’ benefactors has even filed briefs in his Court since giving Thomas a $15,000 gift, and Thomas has not recused himself from each of these cases.

Of course, Thomas is also the least likely Justice to actually follow the command of precedent. Thomas embraces a discredited theory of the Constitution which would return America to a time when federal child labor laws were considered unconstitutional. His fellow justices criticize him for showing “utter disregard for our precedent and Congress’ intent.” Even ultra-conservative Justice Antonin Scalia finds Thomas’ approach to the law too extreme — in Scalia’s words “I am a textualist. I am an originalist. I am not a nut.”

But Thomas’ disregard for what has come before him changes nothing about the precedent he faces. If Abe Fortas had to resign his seat, so too should Clarence Thomas.

Last Updated on Thursday, 30 June 2011 15:08  

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEW NEWSLETTER!

Introducing the One People's Project Newsletter, which will lauch soon! It will keep you abreast of all the events, alerts and other news involving OPP and the work we do! To sign up, click here!

SOCIAL NETWORK

FacebookYoutubeTwitterVimeoReddit
Banner

REVISED ROGUES' GALLERY ENTRY

James O'Keefe

ROBERT FREEMAN
We stopped caring about him years ago, and then his lawyer wife Anna Zubkova had to go and run for a judgeship in Connecticiut, and his activities has made that a concern. To that end, we have updated his Rogues' Gallery entry for the first time in years!

DONATE!!!

We can't do this without your support. If you have time, please help by donating $1, $5, $10, $1 million...

 

Due to the closing of the Brecht Forum, we cannot accept checks or money orders at this time. Although we expect to resolve this shortly, we will not be able to make any donations tax deductable for the time being. We apologize for the inconvience.

 

Erasing Hate

LATEST ALERTS AND EVENTS

Sat Sep 13 @12:00AM - 11:59PM
1ST ANNUAL TORCH NETWORK CONFERENCE

CONTACT US

ONE PEOPLE'S PROJECT
POB 42817
Philadelphia, PA
19101
Phone: (215) 501-7958

Daryle Lamont Jenkins
Founder, Spokesperson

WANTED

We are looking for white power propaganda and materials, old and new, to help our work. Some folks out there have items like this lying around, collecting dust and taking up space. Don't throw it out, send it to us. We can use it. If you wish to donate 'zines, CDs, videos, clothing, photos, documents or other related items, feel free to send them our way. All items will be received on a confidential basis.

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The One People's Project provides this information to help understand who we are dealing with, strongly condemns any unlawful act perpetuated against any person, and discourages its visitors that believe in fighting racism not to be like much of the scum you see on this website. Remember: We have the upper hand. They don't.